بررسی تاریخ‌های کاشت بذر کینوا (Chenopodium quinova Willd) به عنوان کشت دوم از نظر خصوصیات آگروفیزیولوژیک در شرایط اقلیمی کرمانشاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

2 فارغ التحصیل زراعت گروه مهندسی تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی دانشگاه رازی

10.22126/cbb.2024.10354.1067

چکیده

مقدمه: کینوا یک شبه غله بومی منطقه آند در آمریکای جنوبی است و کینوا به دلیل خواص تغذیه‌ای بالا و سازگاری با محیط زیست به عنوان یک گیاه زراعی جایگزین جدید در بسیاری از نقاط دنیا قابل کشت است. انتخاب تاریخ کاشت مناسب به عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین برنامه‌های به‌زراعی، برای دستیابی به عملکرد بهینه در گیاهان زراعی شناخته می‌شود. در مناطق معتدل ایران، بعد از برداشت غلات زمستانه مثل گندم و جو، در زمین زراعی تا پاییز معمولاً گیاهی کشت نمی‌شود. لذا، انتخاب گیاهی به عنوان کشت دوم می‌تواند سبب افزایش درآمد کشاورز گردد. در ایران، تحقیقات چندانی در ارتباط با تاریخ کشت مناسب کینوا به عنوان کشت دوم انجام نگرفته است. هدف از این آزمایش، تعیین تاریخ کاشت مناسب کینوا به عنوان کشت دوم در شرایط آب و هوایی شهرستان کرمانشاه بود.
مواد و روش‌ها: آزمایش در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با 3 تکرار در مزرعه تحقیقاتی پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی در سال 1397 اجرا شد. تیمارهای آزمایش شامل تاریخ کاشت‌های 18و 25 تیر ماه و 1 و 8 مرداد ماه بود. در این تحقیق، برخی صفات زراعی و فیزیولوژیک اندازه گیری شد. تجزیه واریانس با نرم افزار SAS و مقایسه میانگین‌ها با آزمون حداقل اختلاف معنی‌دار (LSD) انجام گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که اثر تاریخ کاشت بر روی صفات ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاحه فرعی، تعداد پانیکول، تعداد دانه در پانیکول، طول پانیکول، تعداد روز تا گلدهی، وزن هزار دانه، عملکرد دانه و بیولوژیک، شاخص برداشت، کربوهیدارت محلول، غلظت پرولین، غلظت کلروفیل a و b معنی‌دار بود. مقایسه میانگین داده‌ها نشان داد که تأخیر در کاشت سبب کاهش معنی‌دار صفات مورد بررسی شد. بیشترین و کمترین میزان این صفات (بجز کربوهیدرات‌های محلول و غلظت کلروفیل b) به ترتیب در تاریخ کاشت‌های 18 تیر ماه و 8 مرداد ماه به دست آمد. بیشترین عملکرد دانه (40/2260 کیلوگرم در هکتار) مربوط به تاریخ کاشت 18 تیر ماه بود که در مقایسه با کمترین عملکرد دانه (40/1331 کیلوگرم در هکتار) به دست آمده در تاریخ کاشت 8 مرداد ماه حدود 70 درصد بیشتر بود. نتایج تجزیه همبستگی صفات مورد بررسی نشان داد که صفات ارتفاع بوته، تعداد شاخه جانبی و عملکرد بیولوژیک به ترتیب بیشترین همبستگی مثبت را با عملکرد دانه داشتند. نتایج تجزیه علیت نشان داد که تعداد پانیکول در بوته و تعداد دانه در پانیکول بیشترین اثر مستقیم و تعداد شاخه جانبی  بیشترین اثر غیر مستقیم را بر عملکرد دانه کینوا داشتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: به طور کلی نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که تاریخ‌های کاشت متفاوت اثر معنی‌داری بر روی عملکرد و اجزاء عملکرد کینوا به عنوان کشت دوم داشت و تاریخ کاشت 18 تیر ماه از عملکرد دانه بالاتری برخوردار بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the planting dates of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) as a second crop in terms of agro-physiological characteristics in the climatic conditions of Kermanshah

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mokhtar Ghobadi 1
  • Yasin Norouzi 2
1 Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 PhD graduated of Agronomy, Razi University
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Quinoa is a semi-cereal native to the Andes region of South America. Quinoa can be cultivated in many parts of the world as a new alternative crop due to its high nutritional properties and compatibility to the environment. Choosing the appropriate planting date is known as one of the most important agricultural programs to achieve optimal yield in crops. In the temperate regions of Iran, after the harvest of winter cereals such as wheat and barley, crops are usually not cultivated in the arable land until autumn. Therefore, selecting plants as a second crop can increase the farmer's income. In Iran, not much research has been done about the proper planting date of quinoa as a second crop. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the suitable sowing date for quinoa as a second crop in the climatic conditions of Kermanshah.
Materials and methods: The experiment was conducted as a randomized complete blocks design with three replications in the research farm of the Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University, Kermanshah Iran, in 2018. The experimental treatments (sowing date) included 9th, 16th, 23rd, and 30th of July. In this research, some agronomic and physiological traits were recorded. Analysis of variance was done with SAS software and means were compared with the least significant difference (LSD) test.
Results: The results of the analysis of variance showed that the effect of planting date on plant height, number of secondary branches, number of panicles, number of seeds per panicle, panicle length, number of days to flowering, 1000 grains weight, grain and biological yields, harvest index, soluble carbohydrates, proline content, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b concentrations were significant. The mean comparison test showed that the delay in the planting caused a significant decrease in the investigated traits of the quinoa plant. The highest and lowest amounts of these traits (except for soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll b concentration) were obtained on the planting dates of the 9th and 30th of July, respectively. For example, the highest grain yield (2260.40 kg ha-1) was related to the planting date of 9th July, which, compared to the lowest grain yield (1331.40 kg ha-1) obtained on the planting date of 30th of July, increased by about 70%. According to the results of the correlation analysis, plant height, number of lateral branches and biological yield had the highest positive correlation with grain yield, respectively. In addition, path analysis showed that the number of panicles per plant and the number of grains per panicle had the highest direct effect, and the number of lateral branches had the highest indirect effect on quinoa grain yield.
Conclusion: In general, the results of this study showed that different sowing dates significantly affected the grain yield and yield components of quinoa. All investigated traits decreased significantly with the reduction of the growth period length. The grain yield of the quinoa can be improved by choosing the appropriate sowing date due to the proper use of environmental resources (light, temperature, etc.).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Planting date
  • yield
  • growth period
  • photosynthetic pigments

مراجع

Abbas, G., Younis, H., Naz, S., Fatima, Z., Hussain, S., Ahmed, M., & Ahmad, S. 2019.  Effect of planting dates on agronomic crop production. Agronomic Crops: Production Technologies, 1, 131-147. ‏
Ahmed, A., Munsif, F., Arif, M., Ullah, I., Nuaman, M. 2011. Yield and yield components of maize as affected by sowing dates and sowing methods. Fuuast Journal of Biology. 1:75-80.
Afiah, S. A., Hassan, W. A., & Al Kady, A. M. A. 2018. Assessment of six quinoas (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes for seed yield and its attributes under Toshka conditions. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 45(6), 2281-2294. ‏
Altuner, F., Oral, E., & Kulaz, H. 2019. The impact of different sowing-times of the quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its varieties on the yield and yield components in Turkey-Mardin ecology condition. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(4), 10105-10117.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_1010510117
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. A., & Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil, 39, 205-207. ‏
Casini, P. 2019. Seed yield of two new quinoas (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) breeding lines as affected by sowing date in Central Italy. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, 113(1), 51-62.‏ https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2019.113.1.05
Castro‐Alba, V., Lazarte, C. E., Perez‐Rea, D., Carlsson, N. G., Almgren, A., Bergenståhl, B., & Granfeldt, Y. 2019. Fermentation of pseudocereals quinoa, canihua, and amaranth to improve mineral accessibility through degradation of phytate. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(11), 5239-5248.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9793
Dubois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A. & Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
Fang, S., Gao, K., Hu, W., Wang, S., Chen, B., & Zhou, Z. 2019. Foliar and seed application of plant growth regulators affects cotton yield by altering leaf physiology and floral bud carbohydrate accumulation. Field Crop Res, 231, 105-114. ‏
Fathi, A., & Kardoni, F. 2020. The importance of Quinoa (Quinoa Chenopodium Willd.) cultivation in developing countries: a review. ‏ Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 3 (183), 337-356. DOI: 10.46909/cerce-2020-030   
Fazeli, F., Akbari, G., Akbari, G. A., Naderi Arefi, A., & Benakashani, F. 2021. Response of different quinoa (Quinoa Chenopodium Willd.) genotypes to planting date in terms of morphological traits, yield and yield components in Garmsar region. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52(2), 41-49. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2020.303866.654725  
Golabi, M., Lak, S., Gilani, A., Fazel, M. A., & Egdernezhad, A. 2022. Growth index, yield and yield components of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) cultivars affected by date and method of planting at Ahvaz Region. ‏ DOI:10.30495/JCEP.202201911931.1721 
Hamza, A., Usman, K., Malik, M. W. I., Saad, M., Ghulam, S., Khan, Z., & Ullah, A. 2022. Response of quinoa genotypes to sowing dates and sowing methods under agroclimatic condition of Dera Ismail Khan, KP Pakistan. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 68(13), 1903-1913.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1939018
Hosseini, S. H., rahemi, A., Biabani, A., Nakhzari moghaddam, A., & Taliey, F. 2021. Effect of sowing date on phonological stage, morphological characteristics, yield and yield Components of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa L.). Journal of Crop Production, 14(2), 17-32. doi: 10.22069/ejcp.2021.17388.2287  
Jacobsen, S. E., Monteros, C., Christiansen, J. L., Bravo, L. A., Corcuera, L. J., & Mujica, A. 2005. Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages. European Journal of Agronomy, 22(2), 131-139.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.01.003
Janni, Y. D., Jadhav, D. B., Madhu, S., & Kumar, S. P. 2023. Response of different varieties, planting density and sowing window on field crops: A review. Pharma Innovation, 12(4):2624-2630. www.thepharmajournal.com
Katsunori, I., Hikaru, S., Daisuke, O., Yudai, M., Hiroki, H., Misa, M., & Toichi, T. 2016. Effects of sowing time on the seed yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) in South Kanto, Japan. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 146-153.
Khanalizadegan A, Madandoust M, Mohajeri F, Bagheri M. 2020. Effects of planting date on yield characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.). Int. J. Pharm. Phytopharmacol. Research, 10(1), 290-298. DOI: 10.51847/SZPYBiuuMD
Lazaridi, E., Papadopoulos, G. K., & Bebeli, P. J. 2020. Andean lupin phenology and agronomic performance under different planting dates in a Mediterranean climate. Agronomy, 10, 3-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10122020
Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. In Methods in enzymology, 148, 350-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879 (87)48036-1  
Liu, C., Liu, Y., Lu, Y., Liao, Y., Nie, J., Yuan, X., & Chen, F. 2019. Use of a leaf chlorophyll content index to improve the prediction of above-ground biomass and productivity. PeerJ, 6, e6240. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6240
Najafinezhad, H., Koohi, N., & Darvishi, D. 2022. Evaluation of grain yield and quality of quinoa cultivars as affected by planting date and plant density in Jupar region of kerman. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 53(1), 113-129. doi: 10.22059/ijfcs.2021.311672.654761
Najafinezhad, H., Shakeri, P., & Amirpour Robat, M. 2021. Effect of Planting Date and Plant Density on Forage Yield and Quality of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) Varieties in Cold Temperate Region of Kerman Province in Iran. Seed and Plant Journal, 36(4), 439-460. doi: 10.22092/sppi.2021.123894
Nazeri, P., Shirani Rad, A. H., Valadabadi, S. A., Mirakhori, M., & Hadidi Masoule, E. 2019. The Effect of Planting Date and Late Season Drought Stress on Eco-Physiological Characteristics of the New Varieties of Canola (Brassica napus L.). Journal of Agroecology, 11(1), 261-276. doi: 10.22067/jag. v11i1.67311
Öktem, A., Öktem, A. G., & Birden, Ö. F. 2021. Impact of sowing dates on forage value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under semi-arid conditions. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Agricultural Research, 5, 171-182.  https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiaar.2021.358.2
Oulmi, A., Frih, B., Guendouz, A., & Benkadja, S. 2022. Effect of sowing date on grain yield, its components and some morpho-phenological traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.) in semi-arid zone in Algeria. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 13(3), 226-234. ‏ DOI: 10.23910/1.2022.2803
Rabbani, S. B., Karimi, G., Khoramivafa, M., Saeidi, M., Boroomandan, P., Bagheri, M., & Zarei, L. 2022. Effect of sowing date and plant density on seed yield and yield attributes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes. Iran Agricultural Research, 40(2). ‏ DOI: 10.22099/IAR.2022.42563.1475
Rahnama, A. A. 2011. The effect of planting date on yield and yield components of two canola cultivars in Khuzestan region. Crop Ecology (Modern Agricultural Science), 6(20), 13-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/463322/fa
Ramesh, K. 2016. Evaluatıon of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) at Different Dates of Sowing and Varied Crop Geometry in Semi-Arid Regions of Telangana. College of Agrıculture Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500, 30. ‏
Salehi, M., Soltani, V., & Dehghani, F. 2019. Effect of sowing date on phenologic stages and yield of Quinoa      (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under saline condition. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 12(3), 923-932. doi: 10.22077/escs.2019.1514.1341
Samadzadeh, A., Zamani, G., & Fallahi, H. R. 2020. Possibility of quinoa production under South-Khorasan climatic condition as affected by planting densities and sowing dates. Applied Field Crops Research, 33(1), 82-104.‏ https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2020.125793.1392
Sief, A. S., El-Deepah, H. R. A., Kamel, A. S. M., & Ibrahim, J. F. 2015. Effect of various inter and intra spaces on the yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Plant Production, 6(3), 371-383.‏ DOI: 10.21608/jpp.2015.49331
Souri Laki, E., Rabiei, B., Jokarfard, V., Marashi, H., & Börner, A. 2022. Evaluation of important agronomic traits related to yield and identification of superior quinoa genotypes. Cereal Research, 12(1), 99-114. doi: 10.22124/cr.2023.23299.1745
Singh, Y. P., Singh, S., Dhangrah, V. K., & Mishra, T. 2021. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield and Yield Components of Different Varieties of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Western Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Economic Plants, 8(4), 188-192. DOI: 10.23910/2/2021.0415h
Taaime, N., El Mejahed, K., Moussafir, M., Bouabid, R., Oukarroum, A., Choukr-Allah, R., & El Gharous, M. 2022. Early sowing of quinoa cultivars, benefits from rainy season and enhances quinoa development, growth, and yield under arid condition in Morocco. Sustainability, 14(7), 4010.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074010
Taosi, M.; Lotfa Ali Aine, G.H. 2016. Quinoa cultivation and related research results. Publication of agricultural education. First Edition. pp. 1-32.  

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار