تاثیرات تلقیح باکتری Bacillus amyloliquefaciens بر رقم حساس و متحمل گندم (Triticum aestivum L.) در شرایط تنش شوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه زابل، ایران

2 دانشیار دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز، ایران.

3 استاد دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زابل، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: جمعیت دنیا روز به روز در حال افزایش است و وسعت خاک­های مناسب کشاورزی برای تأمین غذا، کافی نمی‎باشد. با توجه به ارزش غذایی گندم و نقش آن در تأمین غذا، ناچار باید ازخاک­های نامرغوب و آب­های شور برای کشاورزی بهره گرفت تا مشکل کمبود غذا در جهان تعدیل شود. بنابراین استفاده از آب­های شور برای آبیاری در این شرایط اجتناب‎ناپذیر است. برای حل مشکل شوری، راهکارهای زیادی وجود دارد. اخیراً توجه خاص به استفاده از باکتری­های محرک رشد برای تعدیل اثرات شوری شده است. تلقیح میکروبی برای کاهش تنش شوری، روش بهتری نسبت به روش‎های دیگر است زیرا هزینه‎های تولید و مخاطرات زیست محیطی را به حداقل می­رساند. هدف از این تحقیق، بررسی تغییرات محتویات گیاهی و پرولین، فعالیت‎های کاتالاز (CAT) و گوایکول پراکسیداز (GPx) و الگوی باند پروتئین پس از تلقیح توسط Bacillus amyloliquefaciens و مقایسه با گیاهان غیر تلقیح شده بود.
مواد و روش ­ها: به منظور بررسی اثر باکتری باسیلوس که گونه ای ازباکتری PGPR می­باشد، آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در سه تکرار در گلخانه دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز انجام شد. از دو سطح شوری (0 و 200 میلی‎مولار) به­عنوان فاکتور اول، کاربرد باکتری (بصورت تلقیح و عدم تلقیح به گیاه) به­ عنوان فاکتور دوم و رقم گندم (حساس و مقاوم) به­عنوان فاکتور سوم، استفاده شد. اعمال تنش شوری در مرحله چهار برگی انجام شد. در حین اعمال تنش شوری، سوسپانسیون حاوی باکتری باسیلوس به خاک تزریق می­شد. نمونه­برداری از برگ­ها، 24­ ساعت پس از اتمام تنش شوری انجام شد و همه سنجش­های آزمایشگاهی از قبیل اندازه‎گیری فعالیت آنزیم‎های پراکسیداز، میزان پرولین و غلظت پروتئین روی بافت برگ انجام گرفت. داده­ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SAS تجزیه شده و مقایسه الگوی باند پروتئینی با روش SDS PAGE انجام شد.
یافته ­ها: نتایج نشان داد که کاربرد باکتری در شرایط تنش شوری، باعث افزایش میزان پرولین و فعالیت آنزیم کاتالاز در هر دو رقم حساس و مقاوم شد. اما آنزیم پراکسیداز در رقم مقاوم در شرایط تنش، افزایش پیدا نکرد. همچنین میزان پروتئین کل را در رقم حساس افزایش داد. اثر باکتری روی وزن صد دانه معنی‎دار نشد، اما از آنجا که وزن صد دانه از پارامتر­های رشدی است که به سختی تغییر می­کند، کوچکترین تغییر در آن می­تواند مؤثر باشد که در این طرح مشاهده شد. نهایتاً کاربرد این باکتری باعث تغییراتی در الگوی باندهای پروتئینی در رقم حساس و مقاوم، در شرایط تنش و عدم تنش شوری شد که این تغییرات شامل حذف باند پروتئینی یا بیان بیشتر آن در شرایط مختلف تنش در مقایسه با شرایط نرمال بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens inoculation on sensitive and tolerant wheat cultivar (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Faramarzi 1
  • Abbas Alemzadeh 2
  • Baratali Fakheri 3
1 Department of Production engeneering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Iran
2 Department of Production engeneering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran.
3 Department of Production engeneering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Zabol University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: The world's population is increasing, and the area of suitable agricultural land is not enough to supply food. Considering the nutritional value of wheat and its role in the food supply, poor soils and salty waters must be used for agriculture to solve the problem of food shortage in the world, so the use of salty waters for irrigation is inevitable in these conditions. Recently, special attention has been paid to the use of growth-promoting bacteria to moderate the effects of salinity. Microbial inoculation is better than other methods to reduce salinity stress because it minimizes production costs and environmental damage. This research was performed to investigate the effect of B. amyloliquefaciens inoculation on proline content, catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (GPx) activities, and protein expression in control and treatment plants.
Materials and methods: A factorial experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design with three replications in the greenhouse of the School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, to investigate the effect of Bacillus bacteria (PGPR). The first factor was salinity levels (0 and 200 MM), the second factor was an application of bacteria (inoculated and non-inoculated), and the third factor was wheat genotypes (susceptible and resistant). The suspension containing Bacillus bacteria was injected into the soil during the application of salt stress. Twenty-four hours after salinity treatment, the leaves were sampled and used for all laboratory tests, such as measuring the activity of peroxidase enzymes, the amount of proline, and protein concentration. The data were analyzed using SAS software, and protein band pattern comparison was made by the SDS PAGE method.
Results: The results showed that using bacteria under salt stress increased the proline and catalase enzyme activity in both sensitive and resistant genotypes. Nevertheless, the peroxidase enzyme did not increase under stress conditions in the resistant cultivar. It also increased the amount of total protein in the susceptible variety. The effect of bacteria on the one Hundred-Seeds weight was not significant, but since the weight of one hundred seeds is one of the growth parameters that hardly changes, the slightest change in it can be effective, which was observed in this project. Finally, applying this bacterium caused changes in the pattern of protein bands in susceptible and resistant cultivars under salinity stress and non-stress conditions. These changes included the removal of the protein band or its higher expression in different stress conditions compared to normal conditions.
Conclusion: The plant inoculation by bacteria and its use several times in the roots region of sensitive and resistant wheat has positively affected biochemical properties. Applying these types of bacteria without harming the environment can be a practical method to control salinity stress and maintain optimal yield in salt soils. Control the signals received by the bacteria from the plant and the effects of the bacteria on the growth of the plant by manipulating the bacteria. It can be used as a suitable alternative to the complex and time-consuming methods of gene transfer to the plant.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
  • salt stress
  • wheat
  • SDS-PAGE
Ashraf, M., & Foolad, M. R. 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59 (2), 206-216.
Ashraf, M., Hasnain, S., Berge, O., & Mahmood, T. 2004. Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biology and Fertility of soils, 40 (3), 157-162.
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39 (1), 205-207.
Bianco, C., & Defez, R. 2009. Medicago truncatula improves salt tolerance when nodulated by an indole-3-acetic acid-overproducing Sinorhizobium meliloti strain. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60 (11), 3097-3107.
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72 (1-2), 248-254.
Bruinsma, J. 2009. The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050?
Chance, B., & Maehly, A.C. 1955. Assay of Catalase and Peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology. 11, 764–775.
Dardanelli, M. S., de Cordoba, F. J. F., Espuny, M. R., Carvajal, M. A. R., Díaz, M. E. S., Serrano, A. M. G., Okon, Y., & Megías, M. 2008. Effect of Azospirillum brasilense coinoculated with Rhizobium on Phaseolus vulgaris flavonoids and Nod factor production under salt stress. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40 (11), 2713-2721.
Dashti, N., Zhang, F., Hynes, R., & Smith, D. L. 1997. Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) increases protein and dry matter yield under short-season conditions. Plant and Soil, 188 (1), 33-41.
Dhindsa, R. S., Plumb-Dhindsa, P., & Thorpe, T. A. 1981. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32 (1), 93-101.
Diouf, D., Duponnois, R., Ba, A. T., Neyra, M., & Lesueur, D. 2005. Symbiosis of Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia mangium with mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium spp. improves salt tolerance in greenhouse conditions. Functional Plant Biology, 32 (12), 1143-1152.
Dixon, R. K., Garg, V. K., & Rao, M. V. 1993. Inoculation of Leucaena and Prosopis seedlings with Glomus and Rhizobium species in saline soil: rhizosphere relations and seedling growth. Arid Land Research and Management, 7 (2), 133-144.
Egamberdieva, D. 2009. Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth regulators and IAA producing bacteria in wheat. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 31 (4), 861-864.
Egamberdiyeva, D., & Höflich, G. 2003. Influence of growth-promoting bacteria on the growth of wheat in different soils and temperatures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35 (7), 973-978.
Evelin, H., Kapoor, R., & Giri, B. 2009. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Annals of Botany, 104 (7), 1263-1280.
Gamalero, E., & Glick, B. R. 2011. Mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria. In Bacteria in agrobiology: plant nutrient management (pp. 17-46). Springer.
Ghassemi, F., Jakeman, A. J., & Nix, H. A. 1995. Salinisation of Land and Water Resources: Human Causes, Extent, Management and Case Studies. CAB international, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney.
Grattan, S. R., & Grieve, C. M. 1999. Mineral nutrient acquisition and tanggapane by plants grown in salin environment. Dalam M. Pessarakli (Ed). Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. In: Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York.
Gyaneshwar, P., Naresh Kumar, G., Parekh, L. J., & Poole, P. S. 2002. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant and Soil, 245 (1), 83-93.
Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227 (5259), 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
Nautiyal, C. S., Srivastava, S., Chauhan, P. S., Seem, K., Mishra, A., & Sopory, S. K. 2013. Plant growth-promoting bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NBRISN13 modulates gene expression profile of leaf and rhizosphere community in rice during salt stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 66, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.01.020.
Owens, S. 2001. Salt of the earth. EMBO Reports, 2 (10), 877-879.
Shaharoona, B., Arshad, M., Zahir, Z. A., & Khalid, A. 2006. Performance of Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the presence of nitrogenous fertilizer. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38 (9), 2971-2975.
Sziderics, A. H., Rasche, F., Trognitz, F., Sessitsch, A., & Wilhelm, E. 2007. Bacterial endophytes contribute to abiotic stress adaptation in pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.). Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 53 (11), 1195-1202.
Timmusk, S., & Wagner, E. G. H. 1999. The plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 12 (11), 951-959. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.11.951.
Worldometers. http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ [accessed 28 November 2015.].
Xiong, L., & Yang, Y. 2003. Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid–inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. The Plant Cell, 15 (3), 745-759.
Yildiz, M. 2007. Two‐dimensional electrophoretic analysis of soluble leaf proteins of a salt‐sensitive (Triticum aestivum) and a salt‐tolerant (T. durum) cultivar in response to NaCl stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 49 (7), 975-981.
Zhu, J.-K. 2001. Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 6 (2), 66-71.